- Member Since: April 12, 2021
Description
Wonderful detective
Billy Wilder is one kind of the best directors in the past. A particular feature of his films is that they aren't a little outdated even today. He earned great comedies, great noir films and heavy detective stories. It would be to aforementioned which the'Witness for your Prosecution'of 1957 belongs. I watched that great detective movie Witness for the Prosecution (1957) on #link# free online in HD.
The plot requires the case of Leonardo Vole, who will be charged with murdering an elderly lady for profit. A sick lawyer Wilfrid Robarts, played from the inimitable Charles Lawton, decides to help the man, believing in their innocence. However, all his plans collapse when Leonardo's wife Christina (Marlene Dietrich) appears inside the courtroom ... However, further everything will probably be even more complicated and interesting.
Probably, even most ingenious viewer won't be able to calculate how this story will finish, who'll be really guilty ... The film constantly affords the viewer new and new details of the plot and keeps them in suspense until the particular end.
http://colonybanana18.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/20717918-the-truth-is-somewhere-near?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog Separately, I'd like to note the acting performance of Marlene Dietrich. I think, she was and stays just about the most outstanding actresses inside the reputation of Cinema. She starred in'Witnesses for any Prosecution'already for a venerable age, so she used not her beauty, but exclusively the artist's talent. And Marlene coped along with her role perfectly.
Summing up, we are able to safely claim that'The Witness on the Prosecution'is the most effective detectives from the joy of Cinema and easily an excellent film from a wonderful director.
Films that have received the approval of the general public as “classic cinema” within the decades will have their particular special atmosphere and, usually, develop themes that were, are and you will be relevant. This is the film adaptation of one of many pages on the immortal creativity of Agatha Christie, for nearly half a century it has changed into a frequenter of all kinds of ratings and tops, especially in conjunction with the subgenre of legal drama. Although inside 1950s color cinema had not been longer something outlandish, "Witness for your Prosecution" is remembered largely a result of the traditional black and white palette, or rather one shade.
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s613/sh/c02e60e5-f5fc-de4f-bf14-fed8f0762d43/fa0e2569c4d2ff8afc1f6d43c95662a2 What made Witness for the Prosecution so well liked and expressive. In fact, a complete combination of factors, including original literary, cast, socially relevant topic. Although sensation from the magic of cinema isn't going to arise, and it also can not work in the market to call the film exciting, it, to a certain degree, absorbs for couple of hours of viewing. The viewers spoiled by modern cinema can simply go by, because of prejudices, contrived moral obsolescence. In reality, The Witness for any Prosecution laid down a great deal of those elements that individuals still see in the courtroom dramas and detective stories, which have been based on a semblance of the intellectual challenge. During viewing, once in a while within my head associations with what I've seen, needless to say, favoring the 1957 film.
Are you aware that plot itself, from the height with the items is seen inside the genre (I confess, less than an ambition argument), there is absolutely no all-consuming intrigue that would pour the common cold shower of bright emotions. We will expend a very good part of our own time in a depressing and gloomy courtroom, the spot that the jury will decide the fate with the charged with murdering an elderly widow. blog about movies Interestingly, the twelve jurors are given an exclusively secondary role here, as well as the viewer's attention is drawn specifically the opposition between Defense and Accusation. For my family, the brightest performer has not been Marlene Dietrich, whose benefit performance challenging to not notice, along with her appearance at a decent age for a lady over 50. I was simply subdued through the image of an intolerant and rude, but incredibly professional lawyer performed by Charles Lawton.
